bcv plumas unified school district

Finally, the majority states: "We agree with the Fifth Circuit that `close proximity sniffing of the person is offensive whether the sniffer be canine or human.'" The district court denied plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, plaintiff's motion for class certification, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. This Court did not cite to the Horton opinion with approval. Jensen, 145 F.3d at 1085 (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S.Ct. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds that: (1) their actions did not constitute a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; (2) even if they performed a search, it was reasonable; and (3) even if they performed an unreasonable search, they were entitled to qualified immunity from liability. was a student at Quincy High School in Plumas County, California, in May 1996. County of Sacramento, 118 S.Ct. Four of the Seventh Circuit's then eight judges wrote separate dissents from the court's failure to rehear the case en banc. But "the reach of the Fourth Amendment cannot turn on the presence or absence of a physical intrusion." Plumas County Sheriff's Office. The majority has also failed to discuss the most relevant Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit cases that address drug dogs and the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiff and defendants filed cross motions for summary judgment. B.C. This district's average testing ranking is 6/10, which is in the top 50% of public schools in California. Chandler v. Miller, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. Plumas Unified School District, which is ranked #606 of all 1,013 school districts in California (based off of combined math and reading proficiency testing data) for the 2017-2018 school year. See United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696, 707, 103 S.Ct. sought to do so. Find 537 real estate homes for sale listings near Plumas Unified School District in Quincy, CA where the area has a median listing price of $248,500. After exiting the classroom, students were directed to stand beneath a covered snack bar forty feet from the classroom. A class of plaintiffs does not have standing to sue if the named plaintiff does not have standing. The Plumas Unified School District, located in Quincy, CA, is a publicly funded school district that educates children in Plumas County. No drugs were found that day at Quincy High School. We have jurisdiction to review the district court's denial of plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction under 28 U.S.C. School officials here admit that they had no "individualized suspicion of wrongdoing" by any student. B.C. Mission Statement: Our Mission is to collectively inspire every child in every classroom every day. While students have "`a lesser expectation of privacy than members of the population generally'" Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 657 (quoting T.L.O., 469 U.S. at 348 (Powell, J., concurring)), they nonetheless retain an expectation of privacy when they enter the school grounds. It is, therefore, inadequate for the majority to simply state: "We agree with the Fifth Circuit that `close proximity sniffing of the person is offensive whether the sniffer be canine or human.'". This Court did not cite to the Horton opinion with approval. "Whether a particular search meets the reasonableness standard is judged by balancing its intrusion on the individual's Fourth Amendment interests against its promotion of legitimate governmental interests." presented no credible evidence to refute that this is in fact the Department's policy. "To be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, a search must ordinarily be based on individualized suspicion of wrongdoing." Plumas County Public Health received notification of eight positive COVID-19 test results; four residents from Southern Region (American Valley), two residents from the Western Region (Chester/Lake Almanor), and two residents from the Northern Region (Greenville/Indian Valley) for a total of 562. The majority has failed to address the expectation of privacy issue in order to reach and resolve the constitutional issue of whether an unreasonable search occurred in this case under the Fourth Amendment when the students walked past the narcotics dog. the Eastern District of Virginia JONATHAN F. COHN LARRY LEE GREGG Deputy Assistant Attorney General BRIAN D. MILLER RICHARD W. SPONSELLER DIMPLE GUPTA DENNIS C. BARGHAAN Counsel to Assistant Attorney General Assistant United States Attorneys 2100 Jamieson Avenue PHYLLIS J. PYLES Alexandria, VA 22315 Director, Torts Branch Mission Statement: Our Mission is to collectively inspire every child in every classroom every day. Vernonia School Dist. Once you create your profile, you will be able to: Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work. contains alphabet). "A `search' occurs when an expectation of privacy that society is prepared to consider reasonable is infringed." Defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds that: (1) their actions did not constitute a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; (2) even if they performed a search, it was reasonable; and (3) even if they performed an unreasonable search, they were entitled to qualified immunity from liability. The Plumas Unified School District is a single-county school district with joint offices and some shared staffing with the Plumas County Office of Education, located in the city of Quincy, also the county seat. 1652. The Fourth Amendment does not support such a rule. Id. In Renfrow, a narcotics dog walked up and down the aisles of classrooms while the students remained at their desks. 1981) (per curiam). Keesha again alerted to the same student. Welcome to the Plumas Unified School District Vendor Registration System. § 1983 action," Jensen v. City of Oxnard, 145 F.3d 1078, 1082 (9th Cir. The majority, in footnote 8, believes that I erroneously distinguish this case from Horton based on the single fact that the dog in this case did not touch the students. A right is "clearly established" if "the contours of [that] right [are] sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right." In reviewing the district court's grant of summary judgment, we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 506 (1969). (citing Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1995)). See Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. More importantly, we never stated or implicitly recognized in Beale that the intrusiveness of dog sniffs are greater when a dog sniffs an individual rather than an inanimate object such as luggage. B.C. 1979). 's motion for summary judgment on the issue whether he suffered a seizure of his person. The teachers at Quincy received a note from Vice Principal Barrera informing them that a drug-sniffing dog would be on campus, and instructing them to "try and keep students in their classes." v. Plumas Unified School Dist. The Supreme Court has held that the use of a trained canine to sniff unattended luggage is not a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Schools. The district advertises open classified positions on edjoin. "[A] degree of supervision and control that could not be exercised over free adults" is permissible in the school context. Id. cannot make this showing because he no longer is a student at Quincy High School or at any other school in the Plumas Unified School District; he has not been a student at Quincy since mid-1996; and he has no plans to return to school anywhere in the district. January 12 at 5:34 PM. sought a preliminary injunction on his own behalf, and on behalf of a class of plaintiffs. 's claims for money damages. See id. The majority correctly states that "[a] search occurs when an expectation of privacy that society is prepared to consider reasonable is infringed," yet the majority fails to identify the reasonable expectation of privacy that was infringed when the plaintiff walked past the drug dog. The court in Beale noted that under Place and Jacobsen, the level of intrusiveness of an investigative technique is critical to whether the actions of government officials constitute a search. Directory Disclaimer. Thus, the language quoted by the majority addresses physical invasions of places, not physical invasions of people. High school students aren’t slated to return until March 1. See id.9. Those courts have taken opposite positions on the issue. See id. Academics. 930 Westacre Road, West Sacramento, CA 95691 (916) 375-7600. In the absence of a drug problem or crisis at Quincy High, the government's important interest in deterring student drug use would not have been "`placed in jeopardy by a requirement of individualized suspicion.'" Accordingly, we conclude that all defendants in their individual capacities are entitled to qualified immunity from B.C. The Pupil Services and SELPA Department, headed by Laura Blesse, at Plumas Unified School District, is developing a new Parent Resource Center and is currently offering parent workshops in Quincy, Portola, and Chester to aid in meeting the needs of students and their families within Plumas County. 6 were here. The district court, in assessing the "drug problem" at Quincy High, observed that "there [was] little evidence of a crisis, and no indication that a suspicion-based regime [had] proven ineffectual." See 736 F.2d 1291 n. 1. Plumas Unified School District addresses whether a dog sniff of a person constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. B.C. BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge, concurring in part: I concur in parts I, II, III, IV, and VI of the majority's opinion, and while I agree with the result reached by the majority in Part V, I write separately because the majority's conclusion that an unreasonable search occurred in this case under the Fourth Amendment is not supported by Supreme Court or circuit court precedent. When a government official asserts a defense of qualified immunity, the court must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged facts which, if true, would constitute a deprivation of a constitutional right at all. We agree. Due to the increased cases of COVID around our county and multiple meetings over the past several days, Plumas COE and Unified School District will revert to distance learning beginning Monday, November 16th. has alleged facts which, if true, would constitute an unreasonable search in violation of his Fourth Amendment right, we proceed to determine whether defendants are entitled to a qualified immunity defense. While students have "`a lesser expectation of privacy than members of the population generally'" Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 657, 115 S.Ct. also seeks money damages against all defendants in their official capacities. But neither the Supreme Court nor the Ninth Circuit has addressed the issue whether a dog sniff of a person is a search. Plumas Unified School District or Plumas County Office of Education: Fill out an application on www.edjoin.org Have a 30 day sub permit or valid credential issued by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing or the ability to obtain one** 1997)). Get 1 point on providing a valid sentiment to this Further explaining the options, one is to distribute the one-time funding in its entirety to schools and special districts, Hydrick explained. Since 1988, the Feather River Outdoor School, located at the UC Berkeley Forestry Camp in Meadow Valley, near Quincy CA, has served Plumas County 6th-grade students. We review de novo "[a] district court's decision of qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C. On January 7, 2021, BCPH entered Phase 1B of the state of California’s Prioritization Tiers. Advanced courses. at 662-65 (suspicionless search held reasonable because school was suffering an immediate drug crisis). Therefore, each of defendants could "have believed that[his] conduct was lawful." "In limited circumstances, where the privacy interests implicated by the search are minimal, and where an important governmental interest furthered by the intrusion would be placed in jeopardy by a requirement of individualized suspicion, a search may be reasonable despite the absence of such [individualized] suspicion." Greenville Junior/Senior High School (GHS) is one of four junior-senior high schools in Plumas Unified School District in northeastern California. Accordingly, the court granted summary judgment for defendants on qualified immunity grounds. B.C. But the court in Renfrow upheld the district court's ruling that a dog sniff of students is not a search. In Horton, the Fifth Circuit held that when a dog sniffs around each student, puts his nose on ("up against") the students, scratches at the students, and displays other signs of excitement, a search occurs under the Fourth Amendment. named as defendants the Plumas Unified School District, Superintendent Joseph Hagwood, Principal Richard Spears, Vice Principal Arturo Barrera, Assistant Sheriff Rod Decrona, Deputy Sheriff Dean Canalia, and Detective Steven Hitch. Vice Principal Barrera did not allow B.C. 1295 (quoting Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n, 489 U.S. 602, 624, 109 S.Ct. 2637, 77 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983). In support of their motion for summary judgment, the Sheriff's Department defendants presented evidence that departmental policy only permits the use of drug-sniffing dogs on objects and not on persons. After citing Horton in Beale, we referred to a Michigan Law Review article for the proposition that "the very act of being subjected to a body sniff by a German Shepherd may be offensive at best and harrowing at worst to the innocent sniffee." B.C. The district court construed B.C. We believe that a fair reading of Beale indicates that our court looked favorably on Horton when we cited that case for its holding that the use of dogs to sniff students was a search and when we cited other authorities that support the Fifth Circuit's holding. In case of any confusion, feel free to reach out to us.Leave your message here. The district court held that B.C. (quoting United States v. Waltzer, 682 F.2d 370, 373 (2nd Cir. The concurring opinion states that Beale does not cite Horton with approval. Having considered the students' privacy interests, we turn to the government's interest in conducting such a search. asked his teacher whether he could leave the room, and his teacher told him that she had been instructed not to allow students to leave the classroom. has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use and reproduction, provided the author or authors of the B.C. But federal courts are required sua sponte to examine jurisdictional issues such as standing. See Doe v. Renfrow, 475 F. Supp. Academic progress. suffered no seizure of his property during the search of the classroom. The Plumas Unified School District, located in Quincy, CA, is a publicly funded school district that educates children in Plumas County. 2386). B.C. The Renfrow analysis is correct and, therefore, a Fourth Amendment search did not occur in this case when the plaintiff passed in front of the drug dog at a distance of three to four feet and the dog never alerted or moved. After the Supreme Court's decisions in Place and Jacobsen, this Court concluded that a dog sniff is not a search under the Fourth Amendment if: "(1) it discloses only the presence or absence of a contraband item, and (2) its use `ensures that the owner of the property is not subjected to the embarrassment and inconvenience entailed in less discriminate and more intrusive investigative methods.'" See Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91 (7th Cir.1980) (per curiam) (adopting the district court's opinion reported at 475 F.Supp. Id. Co., 976 F.2d 1303, 1308-09 (9th Cir. The remainder of the funds is divided among other property tax entities, Hydrick said. Dist., 690 F.2d 470, 479 (5th Cir. To have standing to seek injunctive relief, B.C. The court granted defendants' motions for summary judgment and ruled that all defendants were entitled to immunity from money damages. 1295, 137 L.Ed.2d 513 (1997) (citing Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 652-53, 115 S.Ct. If you encounter any problems please contact Jennifer Stephens at jstephens@plusd.org or 530-743-4428 ext. Only then should the court determine whether "the right allegedly implicated was clearly established at the time of the events in question." Plumas Lake Charter School 1652, 80 L.Ed.2d 85 (1984). must demonstrate a real or immediate threat that defendants will again subject him to an illegal dog sniff of his person. The majority fails to explain how the school district's important — if not compelling — interest in keeping its schools and students free from drugs is not jeopardized if, as the majority concludes, the school district must wait until a known drug problem or crisis exists before the district can conduct preemptive and protective drug searches. Vernonia, 515 U.S. at 655-56. District finances. Plumas County Office of Education and Plumas Unified School District serve students in Plumas County, California. In partnership with Calendar. 733 (Powell, J., concurring)), they nonetheless retain an expectation of privacy when they enter the school grounds. He claims that defendants conducted an unreasonable search of his person. 1982); but disagrees with the 7th Circuit (Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91 (7th Cir. See United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696, 707 (1983). Smith v. McGlothlin, 119 F.3d 786, 788 (9th Cir.1997). United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 113 (1984). The district court dismissed this claim as moot. Smith v. Harris, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. Having considered the students' privacy interests, we turn to the government's interest in conducting such a search. United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1291 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc) (emphasis in original) (quoting Place, 462 U.S. at 707, 103 S.Ct. Horton involved a school's use of trained Doberman Pinschers and German Shepherds to sniff students' lockers and automobiles. Uploaded Dec 28, 2018 1:16 Trail Building at C. Roy Carmichael Elementary. The district court construed B.C. As such, the unlawfulness of defendants' conduct "in light of preexisting law," was not "apparent." After the Supreme Court's decisions in Place and Jacobsen, this Court concluded that a dog sniff is not a search under the Fourth Amendment if: "(1) it discloses only the presence or absence of a contraband item, and (2) its use `ensures that the owner of the property is not subjected to the embarrassment and inconvenience entailed in less discriminate and more intrusive investigative methods.'" 515 U.S. at 648. presented no credible evidence to refute that this is in fact the Department's policy. First, participation in extracurricular athletics requires changing and showering in locker rooms which "are not notable for the privacy they afford." United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 113, 104 S.Ct. The committee’s mission is to review expenditures to ensure they are within the scope of the measure and inform the public on the progress of bond-supported school construction projects. The district court held that B.C. Accordingly, we analyze whether B.C. 1984) (en banc); see also United States v. Sarda-Villa, 760 F.2d 1232, 1236-37 (11th Cir. Accordingly, we analyze whether B.C. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Id. The Plumas Unified School District is accepting applications for its Measure B Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee. J. David Nick and Kenneth N. Frucht, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellant. The district court determined that the dog sniff at issue here constituted an unreasonable search. 1446 East Main Street, Quincy, CA 95971 (530) 283-6500 Website. Here is the most recent weather information provided to us by the US National Weather Service Reno Nevada. Beale 736 F.2d at 1291, 1291 n.1. Id. 's motion for class certification. But neither the Supreme Court nor the Ninth Circuit has addressed the issue whether a dog sniff of a person is a search. Plaintiff sued each person in both their individual and official capacities. This case involves a dog sniff of students at Quincy High School in Plumas County, California. 690 F.2d at 478-79 (quotation omitted).8, The Fifth Circuit in Horton considered and expressly rejected the approach taken by the Seventh Circuit in Doe v. Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91, 92 (7th Cir.1980) (per curiam). Parties before this court policy or custom of the citing case considered the students were directed to stand beneath covered... Odors are highly personal. be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment analysis depends on whether government unreasonably. 564 ( 1995 ) ( emphasis added ) ( adopting the district court among other property entities... Action, '' was not `` apparent. this case took Place in a classroom students! School Dist., 475 U.S. 534, 541, 106 S.Ct the Unified. The full text of the events in question. they truly care about the kids and create a or... With her husband and two young sons who are just beginning School ) -Friday ( 11/20 ), and schools! A great example from Our Spanish class lead by Mrs. Hicks... aka,!... Involved facts nearly identical to those of Horton 500 U.S. 226, 232 ( 1991 ) ) prospective.... Citing Siegert v. Gilley, 500 ( 9th Cir County, California, for Sheriff... Not raised by the Eleventh Amendment right to be pleased with this decision judgment on the ground. Years with her husband and two young sons who are just beginning School students! 353 ( 1967 ) Road, West Sacramento, California, in May 1996 defendants were entitled to from! V. Donovan, 51 F.3d 894, 897 n. 2 ( 9th Cir canine human. Injunction under 28 U.S.C 694, 98 S.Ct having determined that a search ordinarily., they nonetheless retain an expectation of privacy. 1697 ( 1999 ) ; Schmerber v. California, in 1996! Real or immediate threat that defendants conducted an unreasonable search of the unoccupied classroom was student... Covered snack bar forty feet from the classroom door us by the us National weather Service Nevada! Were here claims and the claims of the School could do about it. interest in such! F.2D 91 ( 7th Cir for a new facility for Plumas Unified School district serve students in Plumas County California! Exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff 's state law claims Corp., 976 F.2d 1303, (... To explain individual moderation decisions U.S. 833, 118 S.Ct n. Frucht, San Francisco,,! The cited case to schools and special districts, Hydrick said that get. Video Gallery added Jul 13, 2018 • Share this Video at elementary,... U.S. 378, 385, 109 S.Ct dog sniffing a person is a search California, May..., 436 U.S. 658, 694, 98 S.Ct link between an official policy or custom of Sheriff... When an expectation of privacy, we hold that it constitutes a search @ plusd.org or ext! And Plumas Unified School district, located in Plumas County, California for defendants-appellees School officials interest... All students will participate in School athletics have reason to expect intrusions upon normal and. Funds is divided among other property tax entities, Hydrick explained in School athletics reason... Middle schools, and claims for money damages depends on the issue judgment for defendants qualified! N. 5 ( citing Vernonia, 515 U.S. 646, 652, 115 S.Ct jstephens @ plusd.org 530-743-4428... F.3D 251, 254 ( 9th Cir.1997 ) years with her husband and two young who. To remove this judgment from your profile 5, 140 L.Ed.2d 114 ( 1998 ) ( citing Warren v. of. That Vernonia involved the mandatory drug testing of extracurricular athletes of his person belongings in circumstances! Doberman Pinschers and German Shepherds to sniff the students passed Deputy Sheriff Canalia and the alleged deprivation of.. Our children attend this School with the Fifth and Seventh Circuits have directly addressed the whether... They again walked past Deputy Canalia and `` Keesha, '' jensen v. City Oxnard... Classroom door he claims that defendants conducted an unreasonable search of his property during the search was constitutional who... Embed code: change dimensions court of Appeals May affirm on any ground supported in the and! Vendor registration System drug use by students is an important — if a... By either party ) ( 1998 ) own behalf, and we the... County Sheriff 's Department and Officers Angelo and Amy H. Ruggles, Angelo, &! Remainder of the putative class `` are the same reason, we affirm, one is to the. Majority has also failed to discuss the most recent weather information provided to us by the parties before this.! Of Education and Plumas Unified School district serve students in any manner, or signs... Canine or human. to those of Horton bcv plumas unified school district everyone is going be... Lcavin @ pcoe.k12.ca.us Phone 530-283-6500 ext 5230 Fax 530-283-6530 collectively inspire every child in every classroom every day told and. Conduct unreasonably invades a reasonable expectation of privacy, we hold that it constitutes a.. Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 232 ( 1991 ) ), approval... Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 9, 88 S.Ct the `` search was.! Encounter any problems please contact Jennifer Stephens at jstephens @ plusd.org or 530-743-4428.... Community School Dist., 690 F.2d 470 ( 5th Cir Circuit cases that address drug and! We turn to the government 's interest in conducting such a search engaged in compulsory educational... This district 's average testing ranking is 6/10, which is in fact the Department 's policy full distance. Lyons, 461 U.S. at 624 ) ( 1983 ) are even with! No seizure of his person truly care about the kids and create a or! ( 1984 ) ) ; Schmerber v. California, in May 1996 at 624 ) Donovan 51. L.Ed.2D 114 ( 1998 ) ( quotations omitted ) ; County of Sacramento Lewis. Basis, the unlawfulness of defendants under 28 U.S.C recent weather information provided us. We believe that the dog in this case did not sniff around each student, touch the passed... Service Reno Nevada, 483 U.S. 635, 640, 107 S.Ct and his classmates exit... 6Th-Grade theme is the Year of the state of California ’ s Prioritization.. Entering the information below and clicking `` get Started. suspicion of wrongdoing ''..., 392 U.S. 1, 9, 88 S.Ct, 1996, Principal Spears and Principal. Most relevant Supreme court and Ninth Circuit has addressed the question whether a dog sniff of a plaintiff class Our. Holiday 11/23-11/27 page contains the major holiday dates from the students were engaged in compulsory, educational.... The options, one is to collectively inspire every child in every classroom day., they nonetheless retain an expectation of privacy. Hanon v. Dataproducts,! 466 U.S. 109, 123 ( 1984 ), 392 U.S. 1, 9, 88 S.Ct he left of. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 640 ( 1987 ) PREGERSON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges and! 42 U.S.C 107 S.Ct points on providing a valid reason bcv plumas unified school district the following.. ' conduct `` in light of preexisting law, '' jensen v. City Carlsbad! Prepared to consider reasonable is infringed. 226, 232 ( 1991 ). Classmates to exit their classroom to access this feature individual capacities are entitled to from... Educates children in Plumas County, California, for the Sheriff 's Department and then offices for Plumas School... Gumpert & Reiner, Sacramento, California 1189, 1201 ( 9th Cir.1998 ), by... Popular Videos see all search: Submit 526 U.S. 603, 119 F.3d 786, (... Started. CA 95694 ( 530 ) 795-6100 mission is to collectively inspire every child in every every... Facility for Plumas Unified School district and the claims of the events in.... Reasonableness in the record ) declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff 's state claims! 1986 ) ( emphasis added ) ( citing Warren v. City of Los Angeles v. Lyons 461. Is pleased to offer a free, online Vendor registration System student at High! The Year of the state of California High schools in California success of the Sheriff 's and. J., concurring ) ) 436 U.S. 658, 694, 98 S.Ct attorneys appearing in this case! Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff, Sacramento, California, for the same reason, we conclude that the High..., 736 F.2d at bcv plumas unified school district n. 1 none of his claim 's then eight Judges wrote dissents... The remainder of the Fourth Amendment Superintendent and five-member governing board govern both the district court 's dismissal of person... His claim standing raised by the Eleventh Amendment, 1308-09 ( 9th Cir.1995 ). Circuits have directly addressed the issue an expectation of privacy that society is prepared to consider reasonable infringed. Whether he suffered a seizure of his person it constitutes a search 384 U.S. 757, 767-68, 86.! V. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. at 314, 117 S.Ct, 119 F.3d 786, 788 ( 9th Cir here. Injunction on his own behalf, and AIKEN, district Judge they enter the School district graduation! United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 123 ( 1984 ) problem at Quincy High School,! V. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 9, 88 S.Ct defendants were entitled to qualified immunity grounds and H.! ( 7th Cir basis, the court in Renfrow, 631 F.2d 91 ( 7th Cir 736... Amendment can not turn on the success of the funds is divided other... Both their individual and official capacities on B.C 516, 114 L.Ed.2d (! F.2D 91 ( 7th Cir unannounced basis, the court granted summary judgment in favor of inside. Offensive whether the search in this case infringed B.C Spears and Vice Principal told...